If President Joe Biden didn't have enough to worry about with epic low approval ratings, a massive border crisis, rampant inflation, unclaimed cocaine deposits in the White House and a deeply polarized Congress, the corruption charges levied against NJ Senator Bob Menendez yesterday reminded me of the President's other smoldering problems... 
Image by vecstock on Freepik
#1. "10 held by H for the big guy?" According to an article from the Washington Post Fact Checker, an email from one of Hunter's business associates proposes a profit allocation of 20% for each associate except for Hunter's Uncle Jim Biden, who would get 10% -- and a remaining 10% allocable to the "big guy" which would be held by Hunter.
The email author has asserted that the big guy actually refers to Jim Biden, not Joe Biden. However, one of the other business associates in receipt of the email, said that's false and that it actually referred to Hunter Biden's father. Who's telling the truth?
The project was a flop and so there's no financial benefit (at least from this venture) that inured to the benefit of whomever the big guy is, but the whole Jim Biden--Big Guy explanation is odd. If the email author and business partner was already proposing a 10% allocation for Jim Biden, why would he propose that his nephew hold another 10% for him? Why escrow this 10% kicker with Hunter instead of just paying Jim Biden 20%? And is there a history of these business partners calling Jim Biden the big guy?
#2. The second problem is an allegation that if proven, could become equally injurious to President Biden's administration. The allegation is that the Justice Department may have deliberately impeded the investigation of Hunter Biden's tax problems. That allegation is supported by two highly credible IRS sources. If this can be proven, President Biden would presumably allege he knew nothing of it and sack Justice officials on the order of President Nixon's firing of Archibald Cox in 1973 to thwart impeachment. Of course, if it is proven that Joe Biden did know of investigation obstruction; let alone approved of it, he's finished.
I hasten to add, that's a big "if" and it's too early to credibly draw such a conclusion. Yet, if problem #2 has legs, America would sadly witness corruption at least as serious as the famous cover up of a third rate burglary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
