Official portrait, 1981
Having grown weary of internecine clashes within the Republican Party, I recently had an exchange with a local GOP leader. Here's what I wrote....
"Thanks for your response. You mention I should share my thoughts with the State GOP. Fair point. Reagan’s “Eleventh Commandment” applies to all Republicans.
I’m approaching retirement which will free up my time to learn, but right now, I won’t pretend to be steeped in state politics. I know Vos is controversial to say the least and I have much to learn about the influences of the lobbies in your message. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of your claims about who’s ruling the roost and those special interests concern me.
Now, for added context on where I’m coming from, bear with me….
I’m a lifelong Wisconsinite who’s voted Republican at state and federal levels for 42 years. That’s right. I’ve not cast a single vote for a Democrat and never regretted it -- but these days -- my party is at war with itself and we’re fighting Dems with one arm tied behind our backs. Two Republicans at odds with each other often forget they both have more in common with each other, than either person will ever have with Democrats.
I’m a pragmatist because without victory in key elections, we improve little. You write about good quality candidates vs. establishment types. I’m not sure what constitutes an establishment candidate, but I’ve seen GOP candidates, who say the right things, but prove to be ineffective campaigners: Tim Michels for Governor (Rebecca Kleefisch would’ve been better), Tommy Thompson (as much as I admire all that he did in his prime as Governor, his effort for a US Senate seat against Baldwin was miserable), Sarah Palin (she almost single-handedly sunk McCain) etc. Were these candidates establishment, or non-establishment types? I’m not sure the label matters. They all lost.
Either way, we need to allow room for debate within the GOP without destroying each other. For example, I’ve long admired Paul Ryan for his fiscal sanity and unflappable temperament in the DC cesspool, but I totally disagree with him about his choice to not vote for Trump. It’s a binary choice in November. If one does NOT vote for Trump, one is by definition helping Harris.
On the other hand, Trump’s ridiculous remarks about Ryan being the worst Speaker of the House in American history and all the compost Trump hurls at other decent Republicans needs to be countered and freely debated within the party. If it isn’t, then Ryan becomes correct about Trump being a Non-Conservative Populist requiring total fealty from the rest of us.
There’s a common theme here--I see few conservative voices on college campuses, little balance in the mainstream media, and little to no tolerance for disagreement within Republican caucuses whenever Trump comes up. Conservatives must get together, allow reasoned debate among us and run GOP candidates who can win in Madison and up ballot.