When the topic of healthcare reform took center stage this summer, I felt that "healthcare reform" had suddenly become code for "let's change health insurance."
I was certain that I was missing something like the "3.5M jobs saved or created" metric I wrote about last March. I thought I was the only one disturbed by how stimulus programs would be "measured" and conveyed by this administration because I wasn't witnessing views similar to my own.
In my opinion, the healthcare reform yardstick that counts, is the one that actually lowers healthcare costs for the greatest number of patients. But that isn't how we frame the national debate and measure success or failure. Is an expanded insurance pool run by the government going to achieve this goal? I don't know, but uniformly lowering the cost of that pill, that surgery, that MRI, whatever it is -- would benefit us all. I do not see how the House bill will lower health care costs.
President Obama, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Reid, etc. have successfully shifted the narrative from lowering healthcare costs, to demonizing the health insurance industry and expanding government control. All this of course, delights their base. If their bill passes, everyone will be 'covered' by virtue of a new mechanism. That new mechanism is government-mandated, taxpayer funded, healthcare which is not reform at all -- unless one successfully frames the debate that way.
I was certain that I was missing something like the "3.5M jobs saved or created" metric I wrote about last March. I thought I was the only one disturbed by how stimulus programs would be "measured" and conveyed by this administration because I wasn't witnessing views similar to my own.
 |
| Surgeons, Wikipedia |
President Obama, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Reid, etc. have successfully shifted the narrative from lowering healthcare costs, to demonizing the health insurance industry and expanding government control. All this of course, delights their base. If their bill passes, everyone will be 'covered' by virtue of a new mechanism. That new mechanism is government-mandated, taxpayer funded, healthcare which is not reform at all -- unless one successfully frames the debate that way.