A contributor named Lisa (Posted: lisa
December 8, 2007 11:29 PM ) doubts the veracity of my remarks concerning popular opposition to Hillary Clinton (see
my post on Bill Moyers' blog.)
The distrust and polarizing features of Ms. Clinton's candidacy I mention
in that post, are not only consistent with my own views
(and those of a camp referred to these days as "A.B.H." (Anyone But Hillary) they are also supported by some non-partisan research.
This report from USA Today and Gallup may help others see Ms. Clinton's baggage.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/102907/What-Behind-AntiHillary-Sentiment.aspx#2
Note how analyst Jeffrey M. Jones asserts in his subtitle, reasons for Ms. Clinton's negatives...
"
 |
| Hillary Clinton, official public photo |
Basic dislike, policy disagreements, character concerns commonly mentioned"
Jones also contends that...
"...few candidates have ever begun the campaign with such polarized ratings."
Want more? Consider this Harris Poll:
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=744
What's unfortunate about some Hillary Supporters (HS), is that they'll routinely attribute criticism of Ms. Clinton to misogyny. What a slap in the face to all women in public affairs or women with alternative views on Ms. Clinton.
Millions of Conservative men will enthusiastically vote for a woman presidential candidate who shares their views. Unfortunately, such women are not available in
this race.
Yet, some HS maintain American men will only support women if we don't feel "threatened" by them and by extension women we
do admire are only sycophants - shrinking violets in need of male pollen.
Sadly, some people on the Left can't fathom how an African-American like Justice Clarence Thomas holds beliefs at odds with their own. Some even suggest he is an "Uncle Tom". After hearing that explanation, one might ask - who is actually bigoted?
Similarly, for gender card-playing HS who continue to make excuses and stereotype reasons for male opposition to Ms. Clinton, one might ask - who is actually sexist?